Skip to main content

How to test objects equality if they don't implement Object#equals()


Problem: There are cases when you want to test whether two objects are equal, mean did they contain same state or not ? This occurs mostly when you're trying to test JAXB generated beans or any VO/DTO which doesn’t' implement Object#equals() method or/and whose source code you can't modify .

Solution: I knew there is a class (Commons lib's EqualsBuilder class) available which "reflectively" creates the equals method for you taking care all the rules for writing good equals method. But that class doesn’t have a method to test whether two object are equal or not.
At back of my mind, I know Mockito library internally uses the same commons class to solve my problem. I quickly scan the mockito jar and found this class. Here is the code snippet for the same (please note, you have to add mockito jar on classpath for this)
import org.mockito.internal.matchers.apachecommons.ReflectionEquals;
.
.
.
public <T> void assertObjectEquals(final T expected, final T actual) {
     assertTrue(new ReflectionEquals(actual, 
                                    (String[])null).matches(expected));
}
This why Mockito is so famous, it makes your testing easy especially with mocks.

Comments

Дмитрий said…
This is easy solution but
1) This is an internal class which should not be used by clients. You will put your project into a risk using this.
2) The failed test says nothing about differences:
java.lang.AssertionError: expected [true] but found [false]
Expected :true
Actual :false
This is a great post, thanks for writing it.

Popular posts from this blog

Installing i3lock-color on Ubuntu

i3lock is fancy lock screen for Linux. There is i3lock dep available on Ubuntu but its not what I was looking for; I was more interested in i3lock-color . Lets see how we can install the same on ubuntu. PS: I'm using Ubuntu 16.04 Get source code for i3lock-color $ git clone https://github.com/PandorasFox/i3lock-color.git  $ cd i3lock-color Install required packages to build i3lock  $ apt install libev-dev $ apt install libxcb-composite0 libxcb-composite0-dev libxcb-xinerama0 libxcb-randr0  $ apt install libxcb-xinerama0-dev  $ apt install libxcb-xkb-dev  $ apt install libxcb-image0-dev  $ apt install libxcb-util-dev $ apt install libxkbcommon-x11-dev $ apt install libjpeg-turbo8-dev  $ apt install libpam0g-dev Build  $ autoreconf -i && ./configure && make Execute $ ./lock.sh Assign Shortcut In order to assign shortcut, install compizconfig $ sudo apt-get install compizconfig-settings-manager compiz-plugins-extra and then go

INTO OUTFILE query, How to modify & output null values ?

I tried one query (originally asked at JR) on MySQL which export the table data into a file, with a comma delimited field. The query is straight forward and replace the null column value by "\N" character, but when I want to replace that "\N" value by some other character like "0" or simple empty field like " ", its gets little tricky. Here is the base query SELECT Id, name, age FROM student INTO OUTFILE 'c:/result.txt' FIELDS TERMINATED BY ',' OPTIONALLY ENCLOSED BY '"' LINES TERMINATED BY '\n'; And it outputs like, 1, "sagar", 23 2, "anant", 24 Now suppose some 'name' fields are null, then it outputs like 1, "sagar", 23 2, \N, 24 Now to obtain my desired results, which replace this null (\N) values by empty string like, "", I tried out two solutions --1. Using CASE statement SELECT Id, CASE WHEN name IS NULL THEN '' ELSE name END AS NewName, age FROM s

Java Generics: Why I get "name clash" exception when I override methods with different "type" parameter ?

import java.util.*; class Parent { void foo(List<String> list) { System.out.println("parent"); } } class Child extends Parent { void foo(List<Integer> list) { System.out.println("child"); } } When you compile this code you will get an error like Parent.java:7: name clash: foo(java.util.List<java.lang.Integer>) in Child and foo(java.util.List<java.lang.String>) in Parent have the same erasure, yet neither overrides the other class Child extends Parent { ^ 1 error This "name clash" error thrown because of "type erasure" thing when "generics" code gets complied. Let’s see how, When we complied any generics code, the compiler removes the type from the code and treat it as a simple pre Java 1.5 code, like, in our case, compiler saw something like this, import java.util.*; class Parent { void foo(List list) { // oops, <String> get erased. System.out.println("parent"); } } class Child extend